The Partnership: A History of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project
Chapter 6
Forging a Partnership
[161] In planning for the
third round of Soviet-American compatibility talks in the summer of
1971, Glynn Lunney wrote to Professor Bushuyev, expressing his
condolences to the families and colleagues of the Soyuz 11 cosmonauts.
"This sad accident has further strengthened our emphasis on the
solution of the common docking problems." Turning to the work being
done in Houston, he commented, "As no doubt you are finding, there
are many questions which arise as we have time to reflect upon and
plan the work for our meetings later this year." One of these
questions concerned the diameter of the Salyut port. Bill Creasy and
his design colleagues had planned to propose a docking mechanism for
the Soviets to study, but they needed to know what size gear would
fit beneath the Salyut launch shroud, which provided the space
station with aerodynamic streamlining. Lunney enclosed in his August
letter a sketch that reflected the Manned Spacecraft Center's (MSC's)
understanding of the dimensional limitations that would govern the
mounting of such a docking system on Salyut, and he asked Professor
Bushuyev to verify the sizes involved, which he did on 9
September.1
During September, Lunney again sent
correspondence to Moscow regarding a proposed agenda for their joint
meeting; NASA would prefer a two-part approach. "As we agreed in
June," he wrote, "we have given priority consideration to a test
mission between the Apollo spacecraft and the Salyut-type station,"
but our two countries must also continue "work on the technical
requirements and solutions for long-term capability." To meet both
needs, the NASA agenda separated the topics to be discussed into two
categories - long range compatibility issues and a near term test
mission. Lunney hoped that this format would clarify the distinctions
between the immediate and longer range goals of the negotiations. He
also pointedly played down the possibility of a joint mission with
Skylab, by saying that it was much too early to talk about using such
an untested, complex scientific space station.2
Bushuyev replied in October, agreeing that it
appeared possible to look at both long range questions and an
Apollo/Salyut mission "in parallel."3
He [162] also sent lists
prepared for each Working Group regarding documents that the Soviets
believed could be put into final form at this meeting. A fourth list
presented several general documents that they felt should be agreed
upon ultimately. Finally, the Professor suggested the joint meetings
be held from 29 November to 7 December in Moscow. Since this was well
within the time for which NASA had targeted, Lunney accepted and
advised the Soviets that the Americans would plan to arrive on the
evening of Saturday, the 27th.4
1. NASA, MSC, "A Docking
Mechanism for Apollo/Salyut-Type Spacecraft," 17 Nov. 1971; and
Robert R. Gilruth to Arnold W. Frutkin, 29 July 1971, asking
transmittal of letter, Glynn S. Lunney to Konstantin Davydovich
Bushuyev, 3 Aug. 1971. Before this letter was sent, Frutkin asked for
Chuck Mathews concurrence. This formality was subsequently dropped as
Lunney's authority broadened and efforts were made to speed
communication. See J. Leroy Roberts to Charles W. Mathews, note, 2
Aug. 1971, with Mathew's concurrence dated 3 Aug.
2. Gilruth to Frutkin,
16 Aug. 1971, asking transmittal of letter, Lunney to Bushuyev,
undated, with the following enclosures: NASA, MSC, Bidford F.
Cockrell, "Coordinate Systems Standards for International Rendezvous
and Docking of Spacecraft," MSC Internal Note No. 71-FM-312
(MSC-04746), 9 Aug.1971; "Recommendations for a Communication Channel
between the USA and USSR Mission Control Centers to Support
International Manned Spacecraft Rendezvous and Docking" [n-d.]; NASA,
MSC, "Technical Requirements for Compatible USA and USSR Docking
Systems," 6 Aug. 1971; and NASA, MSC, "Several Concepts of
Communications and Tracking Systems for US/USSR Compatibility Study,"
13 Aug. 1971. See also Gilruth to Frutkin, 20 Sept. 1971, asking
transmittal of letter, Lunney to Bushuyev [n.d.], with separate
agendas for all three Working Groups attached. René Berglund
had been concerned about the need to differentiate between the new
and far term in June. See René A. Berglund to Gilruth, memo,
"Notes on the June 21-25 Soviet Visit," 30 June 1971.
3. Bushuyev to Lunney, 8
Oct. 1971, with two enclosures: "Predlozheniya po znacheniyam
parametrov sistem upravleniya, radionavedeniya i svazi,
obespechivayushchikh sblizheniye i stykovku kosmicheskikh korabley i
stantsiy SSR i SShA" [Proposed value of parameters for control, radio
guidance, and communication system ensuring the rendezvous and
docking of USSR and USA spacecraft and stations] and "Tekhnicheskiye
trebovaniya k atmosfere obitayemykh otsekov, sposobam perekhoda,
agregatam i sistemam, neobkhodimyye dlya obespecheniya perekhods
ekipazhey posle stykovki kosmicheskikh korabley ili stantsiy SSR i
SShA" [Specifications for crew compartment atmosphere, transfer
methods, and units and systems needed to provide for the transfer of
crews after USSR and USA spacecraft and space stations have
docked].
4. Bushuyev to Lunney,
28 Oct. 1971; and Lunney to Bushuyev [n.d.].
|