The Partnership: A History of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project
Round Three - Moscow
[165] Glynn Lunney, Bob
Gilruth, and their 18 companions arrived in Moscow on Saturday
evening, 27 November 1971, where their welcome by members of the
Soviet delegation was given considerable attention by the Soviet news
media. The Americans were processed quickly through immigration and
customs formalities, arriving at the Hotel Rossiya about 90 minutes
after landing. On the way to the hotel, Lunney and Bushuyev,
accompanied by an interpreter, had a pleasant chat about their past
work and plans for the coming week, a discussion which was continued
later that evening at a Soviet-hosted dinner at the Rossiya. Sunday
was essentially a free day, and most of the Americans went on a
special bus tour of Moscow, which included the People's Exhibition of
Economic Achievements. Lunney noted that the space display at the
exhibition grounds had some new exhibits - two full-scale Soyuz in
docked configuration, the Luna
16 lander, which had visited the moon
and returned with a small sample of lunar soil, and a replica of the
moon rover Lunokhod.10
On Monday morning, the NASA delegation went to
the Institute of Automatics and Telemechanics, a 30-minute bus ride
from the hotel. The Institute, sponsored by the Soviet Academy of
Sciences and devoted to the study of automatic control systems
(cybernetics), was also home base for Academician Petrov. The NASA
group gathered with the Soviets for a plenary session in a large
lecture room. After introductory remarks and some discussion of the
week's agenda, Lunney gave the Soviets two papers. One summarized the
present status of the American long-term technical requirements and
the other details of a possible Apollo/Salyut mission.11 When the Soviets reciprocated at the end of the
morning session, the two groups spent the remainder of the day
translating and studying. The Soviets were reluctant to begin any
detailed discussions until they had an opportunity to more fully
understand this new material. While one of the American interpreters
read aloud in Russian to the Soviets from the NASA papers, a quickly
transcribed version of shorthand notes taken from a verbal
translation of the Soviet materials was prepared for the
Americans.
In addition to these basic documents, Lunney
and his colleagues argued for and obtained a chance to present for
the entire Soviet group highlights of the U.S. mission model and
docking mechanism studies. The quick summary gave everyone, including
Academician Petrov and his executive staff, a basic understanding of
the NASA ideas for a joint mission. With this background, the three
Working Groups could go their separate ways, but they would be
negotiating within a more clearly understood framework.
Lunney reported that in Working Group 1, which
he chaired, the Soviet side had "very capable experts on the subjects
of life support and mission planning."
[166] At various times during the week, the men were able
to divide into smaller subgroups to discuss specific topics. With the
aid of the interpreters, "a good deal of understanding was reached,
and several enclosures on specific subjects were prepared for
inclusion in the minutes." Looking at the experiences of the other
groups, Lunney commented, "Working Group #2 also used the splintering
technique because of the multitude of systems that were covered. . .
. Working Group #3 on the docking mechanism tended to work more as a
group . . . because of the nature of their [topic]." He believed that
by following the Low precedent - preparing ahead of time documents
similar to those agreements that were desired - the NASA
representatives in Working Groups 1 and 2 "were able to lead most of
the discussions and focus on the parts of the problem that we felt
[were] significant."12
The remainder of the week (29 November-3
December) was spent in Working Group sessions, with the specialists
devoting most of Friday and part of Saturday documenting their
results. Those who could get free that weekend were taken to Star
City, where they toured the cosmonaut training facilities. Lunney saw
K. P. Feoktistov there, and the designer-cosmonaut gave his American
friend an in-depth briefing on the Soyuz control systems. After a
stand-up buffet luncheon given by the Commanding General of Star
City, the Working Group members returned to Moscow. Sunday was spent
sightseeing, with a trip to the Zagorsk monastery, about 81
kilometers from Moscow.
On Monday, 6 December, the delegations met a
final time at the Institute to verify and sign the minutes of their
meetings, with the executive staffs reading and authenticating their
minutes and those of the Working Groups. The Summary of Results,
which included the minutes of each Working Group as attachments, was
signed at the House of Scientists that evening.* Lunney subsequently commented that this whole
procedure was "a fairly tedious process, [but] sufficient time must
be programmed for this not-very-productive necessity."13
* The names of the
signatories to these and subsequent joint minutes are presented in
appendix C.
10. Lunney to
distribution, memo, "Trip Report on Visit to Moscow on Compatible
Rendezvous and Docking" [n.d.].
11. The two American
papers were NASA, MSC," U.S. Summary of Possible Apollo-Salyut Test
Mission," Nov. 1971; and NASA, MSC, "U.S. Summary of Present Status
of Technical Requirements," Nov. 1971.
12. Lunney to
distribution, memo, "Trip Report" [n.d.].
13. Ibid.
|