The Partnership: A History of the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project
Soviet Worries About Apollo Minus
X
Thrusters
According to the Americans, there was nothing
to worry about. As Apollo approached Soyuz, the attitude control
motors used to brake the [275] craft would not
send exhaust far enough to burn the thermal insulating blanket that
protected Soyuz from the heat of the sun, nor would the Soyuz radio
antennas be affected. But the Soviets were worried that the plume of
the thrusters might hit their craft if the astronauts forgot to shut
down those -X engines* after capture by the docking gear, As in the case of
the American worries over Soyuz, the home team could not quite see
what all the fuss was about. Nevertheless, they had to attend to
their visitors' unease.63
Ed Smith, whose Working Group 2 had to deal
with such problems, traced the origin of the Soviet interest in the
possible impingement of the -X thrusters on Soyuz to
a Skylab movie that Max Faget had taken to the U.S.S.R. to show at a
gathering of space scientists. In this movie, the Skylab parasol
fluttered in reaction to firings of the Apollo thrusters as the
docking approach was executed. Subsequently, at the August-September
1974 sessions in Moscow, Vladimir Timchenko, Soviet chairman of Group
1, asked his American colleagues if these thruster firings could be
expected to have any effect on Soyuz. Timchenko's concern was
associated less with the possibility of damage to Soyuz than that the
control system firings in the vacuum of space would upset the
attitude of Soyuz and cause the ship to deviate from the reference
attitude it needed to maintain during the docking maneuvers.
Richard Haken, a contract employee working
with Group 2, said that he would pull together all the data JSC had
concerning the expected lengths of time for -X thruster firings when
Apollo was both approaching and docking with Soyuz. He gave his
findings to the Soviets during the November 1974 Houston meeting, and
they took them home to study. Following their analysis, they sent a
specialist, B. P. Skotnikov, to Houston in December with a Working
Group 1 delegation to work with Smith, Haken, Steven Pollock, and
Roscoe Lee on the possibility that the Apollo control system firings
could create disturbance torques that would upset Soyuz. They
concluded in the negative:
At this meeting, both sides have
presented and discussed the materials on the evaluation of the
disturbance forces and torques, which affect the Soyuz spacecraft
during operation of the Apollo RCS jets when docking. . . . As
described in USA WG2-051, during normal docking, the Apollo RCS jets
work in pulses. It was noted that beginning with a distance of six
meters during docking, Apollo RCS jet pulses of 0.5 sec and larger
are extremely rare and their repetition extremely remote. Both sides
concluded that when the Apollo RCS jets work in pulses, small
disturbance torques exist which do not cause deviation in the
attitude of the Soyuz spacecraft.64
[276] But the Apollo
thruster question did not end in November. At the January-February
meetings, the Soviet delegation included A. G. Reshetin, an
aerothermal expert who wanted to discuss the thermal impingement of
the thruster firings on the surface of Soyuz. These talks covered the
entire approach and docking sequence. From these reconsiderations of
the -X
thruster firings, the Americans came to understand that the basic
worry the Soviets had was not how long the reaction control system
(RCS) jets might be fired during approach but just what guaranteed
that they would be shut off after capture by the docking system. The
Americans said that one had to rely upon the crewmen to throw the
switches that would inhibit further operation of the thrusters. This
reliance on men bothered the Soviets, who would have preferred to
have those engines controlled by an automatic system.
The "RCS impingement problem," as it became
known, bounced around during the January-February discussions until
it promised to become a real issue of more magnitude than seemed
justified in the minds of the Americans. To the Soviets, it continued
to be a worrisome topic that needed further explanation and a
definitive resolution. They wanted the Americans to state in their
flight plan that the Apollo crew "shall not" use the -X thrusters within 10
meters of Soyuz. Lunney had to step in and take a firm hand because
the entire discussion was getting out of hand and no resolution
appeared in sight.
Following a frank meeting on 30 January in
which Lunney and his team discussed the meeting's progress to date,
Ed Smith gave the Professor the run down on a procedure that would
ensure that the -X engines would not be fired after capture was made by
the docking system. As Smith explained it, when the Apollo docking
system captured Soyuz, an indicator light would appear in Apollo, and
the Command Module Pilot would call out "contact" to the Commander,
who would cease forward translation. At that point, the Commander
would switch control of the RCS engines from the stabilization and
control system to a second system controlled by the command module
computer in a free mode (CMC-free), which would operate only upon a
manual command given through the hand controller. While the RCS
system was in this dormant condition, the commander would reach up
and turn off the four RCS automatic select switches that control the
forward firing thrusters. Finally, the computer would take over
again, correcting the pitch and yaw of the two spacecraft as needed.
The entire process would take only a matter of seconds.
When Smith completed his description, there
followed a 40-minute discussion, and the process was described again
and again. Bushuyev had a number of questions. V. P. Legostayev
explained the process in Russian to Petrov and the Professor, while
sketches were passed back and forth across the table. With Yuri Zonov
and Alex Tatistcheff interpreting, Lunney tried to answer the
Soviets' several questions. The scene was hectic, and in the end
Bushuyev still had some doubt in his mind about relying upon the crew
to throw those important switches.
[277] RCS impingement problem,
January 1975
|
Soviet concern that the Soyuz
spacecraft would be endangered by the exhaust from Apollo's
reaction control system (RCS) received much attention during
the meetings in Houston in January-February 1975. In one of
the Working Groups, flight director Alexei Yeliseyev (left)
listens as Pete Frank (gesturing with pen) explains the
safeguards provided in the firing sequence of the RCS. Also
listening (left to right) are Gene Cernan (obscured by
Yeliseyev), Yu. S. Denisov, N. Latter, R. D. White, Frank,
V. P. Legostayev, V. S. Syromyatnikov, and B. V.
Nikitin.
|
|
|
At left above with arm
extended, Yuri Zonov asks Lunney a question about RCS
impingement.
Finally, Professor
Bushuyev, still not convinced, asks to see the astronauts
throw the RCS isolation switches in the command module
simulator to observe how much time it takes to disarm the
-X
thrusters.
Left, all are smiling on
the way back from the simulators where Lunney, Bushuyev, and
others have watched the RCS exercise perfomed to everyone's
satisfaction.
|
At this point, the whole "RCS impingement"
issue was becoming an emotional subject. Some of the astronauts were
openly upset that the [278] Soviets would
question their training and discipline when it came to executing the
proper sequence of actions. While Legostayev understood the
Americans' explanation, Yeliseyev, the flight director, was still not
convinced. According to Zonov, "Yeliseyev was the big skeptic." The
issue was at last resolved on 5 February when Petrov and Yeliseyev
climbed into the Apollo command module simulator and went through the
procedures from the calling out of "capture" to throwing the proper
switches. Once they saw how it worked, the troublesome issue seemed
to go away. It also appeared that Petrov was growing tired of this
recurring topic, and being personally convinced that there was no
real problem he told his people to drop it. At the ASAP briefing the
next morning, Bushuyev indicated that there had been some concern
about the possibility of RCS impingement but that it had been the
subject of enough discussion.
The RCS controversy demonstrated the different
approaches to rendezvousing and docking spacecraft automatic versus
pilot controlled and while it had been a real worry for many of the
specialists, Lunney had not let it upset him. It was a problem for
which there was a technical solution. Once his men told him how they
intended to handle the matter, he explained it to the Soviets and
invited them to the simulator where they could see that the proposed
solution was indeed satisfactory. It was all part of a day's work,
and there was no need to become emotional. On 31 January, when the
issue was still pending, Lunney was asked how the meeting was going.
He responded, "This . . . is a piece of cake"; he wished that he
could get away from the Grumman building, where the talks were being
held, and go back across NASA Road 1 to clean up the paper work on
his desk. When asked about the RCS situation, he smiled with a
characteristic twinkle in his eyes and said, "Nyet problem." Then he
added, "If you think that is a hot issue, you should have seen some
of our earlier go-arounds." Chomping down on his cigar, he went in
search of a cup of coffee.65
* Minus X engines are the
forward firing thrusters used to brake or slow down the Apollo
spacecraft.
63. Interview, Herbert
E. Smith, Richard Haken, Steven Pollock, and Roscoe Lee-Ezell, 12
Feb. 1975.
64. "Meeting Minutes,
Joint Meeting of Working Group 1," 25 Nov.-20 Dec. 1974.
65. This description of
the RCS impingement meeting is based upon notes taken by Ezell during
that discussion and upon subsequent talks with Eugene A. Cernan,
Lunney, and members of Working Group 2. Yuri Zonov's comment was made
to Ezell after the trip to the simulator.
|